Start Searching the Answers
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
The Question & Answer (Q&A) Knowledge Managenet
The Internet has many places to ask questions about anything imaginable and find past answers on almost everything.
Science and Progress after WWII Specifically, Silent Spring explained how indiscriminate application of agricultural chemicals, pesticides, and other modern chemicals polluted our streams, damaged bird and animal populations, and caused severe medical problems for humans.
Silent Spring prompted Congressional hearings. On 4 April 1963, the day after a CBS documentary on the book aired, Connecticut senator Abraham Ribicoff announced hearings on pollution, including federal regulation of pesticides. After Silent Spring, Congress revised the regulation of chemicals.
Rachel Carson’s purpose in writing Silent Spring was to show the harmful effects of using pesticides on the natural world and on human health. She also wanted to expose the false claims of the chemical industry that their pesticides were not harmful.
Most importantly Silent Spring launched the modern global environmental movement. The ecological interconnections between nature and human society that it described went far beyond the limited concerns of the conservation movement about conserving soils, forests, water, and other natural resources.
Today marks half a century since the publication of one of the environmental movement’s seminal books – Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. And today, its impact still reverberates heavily within environmental circles. But half a century on, other pesticides continue to threaten numerous species.
The book was an indictment of the widespread use of petrochemical-based pesticides developed during World War II in the U.S. Silent Spring made a bold claim: “For the first time in the history of the world, every human being is now subjected to contact with dangerous chemicals from the moment of conception until death.”
Before her book Silent Spring was published in 1962, Rachel Carson knew it would be controversial. Carson had written about how the reckless use of pesticides was contaminating the natural environment and slowly poisoning living things. She knew her claims would surprise “99 out of 100 people.”.
President Kennedy understood the importance of Carson’s book. He asked his Science Advisory Committee to research Carson’s claims in Silent Spring. In 1963 the Committee released a report called “The Uses of Pesticides.” It supported Silent Spring. Environmental activists continued to push the government to regulate pesticides.
Over and over in his criticism, Diamond points to the grand accusations of Silent Spring with incredulity and little else: “What, finally, is Silent Spring ’s game? If we were to believe Miss Carson’s own description of our times — an era where the right to make an irresponsible dollar is seldom challenged — then the answer would be an easy one.